9:10 pm
Diddy and the Twins in Luomo Vogue → What Was He Thinking?
On Wednesday, Diddy held a little celebration at 1Oak in New York for his L’Uomo Vogue cover. That’s the first pitbull in a skirt, Eve (recognize, SP) taking a look at the photo spread. I’m guessing that slight ‘uhhh’ on her face came when she saw Diddy and his twin daughters, D’Lila and Jessie, posing sans clothes.
We’ve all seen celeb baby pics. Angelina Jolie and Tom Cruise with their shirtless babies.. but these girls ain’t newborns and they’re not in a tub.
Where are their clothes?
They had fun in the park. Is that necessary?
I’m sure someone will think I’m overeacting, but imagine you and your kids are contracted for a magazine spread and everyone agrees.. no clothes, just bow ties.
At bare minimum 
some pieces from the Sean John toddler line were in order.
☼ What's Your Opinion? ☼
MsMoni- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 2:20 amI’m not understanding this picture at all. This is distasteful. To each is his or her own…but this is just wrong on so many levels.
Maika- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 5:54 amBeautiful Kid and a wonderful dad. I love this, keep doing great man. I’m cool headed like Obama
Reggie- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 12:25 pmOK, I am not going to get all bent out of shape about this. Was it a poor choice? Yes. But lets be real people, it’s not like these girls have matured. MsMoni said it best it was distasteful but there is nothing to get all outraged about.
angela- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 8:22 pmthis is very cute!!! damn i wish the dad had gotten undressed too. lol.
joeliz807- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 10:41 pmoh hell no this is not cute.. maybe if they was boyz but they are girls and they should have something cute on like a dress.. something .. wat was diddy smoking…
lizzy- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 10:48 pmhe was smoking the same shit that you’re smoking. you narrow minded ass.
Jay Jay- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 10:48 pmI agree, this ain’t cute, the children should have clearly had on some clothes. He looks dapper but the kids are naked? That shit aint cute.
Stymuli- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 11:39 pmI like to believe I’m as open-minded as they come. I still however, can’t find the point to this… child exploitation. Maybe it’s me, but I don’t see the cute factor. This, to me at least, doesn’t seem resonate with cuteness as much as say, an Anne Geddes photograph. I mean, am I wrong?
Blambo- Sat, Oct 25, 2008 - 11:45 pmNo, you are not wrong. This was clearly another bad decision as was the Ciara photo. It definitely isn’t you Stymuli there is nothing cute about this.
Jack- Sun, Oct 26, 2008 - 7:43 amThis is distasteful. Shame on Kim, Diddy and Grandma! The twins are not toddlers, they should cover their chest, and lose the dang bow ties. WTF?
Will- Sun, Oct 26, 2008 - 11:32 amWell shame on Kim for continuing to have children by a man just for a fucking paycheck anyways!!!
Moe- Sun, Oct 26, 2008 - 11:34 pmI do not like this flick at all. The girls should have something on, he is fully dressed i just don’t get this at all.
TIFATAT- Wed, Oct 29, 2008 - 7:12 pmI DID NOT THINK IT WAS THAT BAD SO THEY HAVE NO SHIRT ON SO WHAT THOSE ARE HIS CHILDREN AND THAT’S HIS CHOICE.I THINK THE GIRLS ARE CUTE AND ITS NOT LIKE THEY ARE NUDE.MANY PEOPLE TAKE PICS OF KIDS NUDE NO ONE MAKES A BIG DEAL ABOUT THAT. PEOPLE HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY CAUSE OF WHO HE IS I SAY PUFF DO YOUR NUMBERS AND LET THE HATERS HATE.PEACE VOTE OBAMA.
Bad Idea- Wed, Oct 29, 2008 - 7:28 pmPeople take pics of their children nude but it is not for the world to see. This was a bad choice, I know there are at least 500 outfits he could have put on those girls. The girls are cute but he should have thought before he did this.
You won’t often see unprovoked obscenities from me, but what a fuckin’ bumbaclart, grade-A, asshole. I mean what the fuck?!